SOFTWARE DELIVERY, VERIFIED

Before you approve the work, know what was delivered.

A developer says your milestone is complete. UpperCheck compares the agreement to a locked delivery, checks the available evidence, and makes the gaps impossible to overlook.

Explore a sample review See how it works

Built for founders, software buyers & technical advisors

DELIVERY SNAPSHOT LOCKED

MILESTONE REVIEW SYNTHETIC DEMO

Core Currency EngineDelivery A · $6,400 milestone

ACCEPTANCE RECOMMENDATION

HOLD ↗

More evidence is needed before acceptance is supported.

✓Decimal precisionSupported

✓Architecture & designSupported

!Functional demonstrationEvidence gap

✓ NOTHING ASSUMED. GAPS MADE VISIBLE.

NOT ANOTHER CODE REVIEW TOOL.

01 Contract-first

02 Evidence-linked

03 Decision-focused

THE ACCEPTANCE GAP

“It’s done” isn’t the same as “it meets the agreement.”

Traditional code review asks whether the code looks good. Project dashboards track whether a task was marked complete. Neither necessarily answers the question behind your next payment:

Did the delivered software meet the specific promises we agreed to?

UpperCheck starts with those promises. It ties findings back to available source, tests, and CI evidence—while clearly separating what is supported from what remains unverified.

01 / REQUIREMENTS

≡

Start with what was promised

Review and confirm the actual acceptance obligations, not a generic quality checklist.

02 / EVIDENCE

⌁

Look beyond green checkmarks

Inspect the cited implementation, tests, and available execution records at a fixed commit.

03 / DECISION

↗

Know what to do next

Get an evidence-backed ACCEPT, HOLD, or DO NOT ACCEPT recommendation and next actions.

INTERACTIVE PRODUCT EXAMPLE

Same agreement. Different evidence.

See how the recommendation changes when the delivered evidence changes.

SYNTHETIC DEMONSTRATION
NOT A REAL CUSTOMER PROJECT

SAMPLE REVIEW

Core Currency Conversion Engine

$6,400 milestone · Seven confirmed promises

RECOMMENDATION

HOLD

The supplied evidence supports several promises, but direct functional proof remains incomplete.

Evidence-first
acceptance logic

Acceptance area	What the evidence shows	Assessment
Decimal precision	Supporting implementation and tests observed	Supported
Architecture	Required design evidence available	Supported
Reproducibility	Project setup and reproducibility evidence available	Supported
Direct functional proof	Relevant execution proof incomplete	Gap

A missing proof isn't the same as a failed delivery.UpperCheck can recommend HOLD when acceptance isn't yet justified by accessible evidence.

This interactive example summarizes UpperCheck's synthetic demonstration cases. It is not an exported report or proof of live customer outcomes. Actual results depend on confirmed terms and accessible evidence.

A CLEAR, CONTROLLED PROCESS

From agreement to decision, with a record of why.

UpperCheck turns software acceptance into a reviewable process rather than a conversation based on trust alone.

Request a walkthrough

Bring the agreement

Provide the selected milestone and its contractual language. UpperCheck proposes verifiable obligations for a person to confirm or correct.

Lock the delivered version

Fix the review to one GitHub commit, so the evidence corresponds to a particular delivery rather than a moving branch.

Examine the evidence

Inspect relevant public GitHub source, test definitions, available CI records, and supporting documents—without executing repository code.

Review and decide

Read requirement-level findings, gaps, and buyer actions. Retain a tamper-evident report while the human buyer makes the final acceptance decision.

BUILT FOR CONSEQUENTIAL DECISIONS

Not just an answer. A defensible trail of evidence.

Contract-first, not code-first

Start with the obligations that matter to acceptance, rather than a general-purpose scan.

Evidence with provenance

Link findings to specific source excerpts and a frozen GitHub commit.

Conservative when uncertain

Missing evidence is surfaced as a gap. It is not automatically treated as a defect—or quietly assumed to be proof.

Human authority preserved

The buyer confirms the requirements and remains responsible for acceptance. UpperCheck supports judgment; it doesn't replace it.

WHO IT'S FOR

For anyone accountable for signing off.

Founders & software buyers

Know which promises have support before accepting an outsourced milestone or releasing the next payment.

Fractional CTOs & advisors

Bring a structured evidence trail into your existing technical oversight process and client conversations.

Internal technology teams

Create a clearer acceptance record when evaluating an outside development vendor's delivery.

COMMON QUESTIONS

What to know before a review.

Clear limitations are part of a trustworthy verification process.

Is UpperCheck the same as automated code review?+

No. General code review focuses on code quality and change-level concerns. UpperCheck focuses on whether a specific software delivery has evidence supporting the confirmed contractual obligations for a selected milestone.

Does UpperCheck run the developer's code?+

No. It inspects available source, test definitions, and captured evidence. A test file is not the same as a verified execution result, and the report preserves that distinction.

Can it review private repositories?+

The current beta reviews publicly accessible GitHub repositories. Secure access for private repositories is not yet available in this release.

Is the outcome automatically approved by a human expert?+

No. The buyer must confirm the interpreted requirements and remains responsible for any acceptance decision. A separate independent human-review service is being explored and is not part of the current automated workflow.

Is the report a legal certification or guarantee?+

No. UpperCheck provides evidence-backed decision support based on the materials it can inspect. It does not guarantee production behavior, establish complete code coverage, or provide legal advice.

LET'S COMPARE NOTES

See whether it works for your next milestone.

We're speaking with a small group of software buyers and technical advisors. Bring a real workflow question, an existing review process, or simply your curiosity.

✓ Product walkthroughs and scoped pilot discussions

EARLY ACCESS / INTRODUCTIONS

Start with a conversation.

No commitment, no pressure to replace an existing tool. We'll see whether UpperCheck adds meaningful evidence to the decisions you already make.

Request a product walkthrough A short introductory conversation. No client code needed for the first meeting.